JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 21, 2022

A- de 2022

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio José Lizarazo Ocampo

✓Claimant Monsalve Jiménez Edgar Giovanny·Respondent --

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

The case-law reporter has not yet indexed topics for this decision. The summary below describes what it is about.
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto la Sala Plena de la Corporación decidió AMPLIAR en treinta días el término para la recolección de las firmas de la Sentencia C-308/22.

Lo anterior, en atención a la solicitud del magistrado sustanciador en la que argumentó la necesidad de realizar ajustes sustanciales a la ponencia inicialmente presentada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (24 points)
  1. AMPLIAR en treinta días el término para la recolección de las firmas de la Sentencia C-308 de 2022 (Expediente D-14.622).
  2. Cúmplase,
  3. CRISTINA PARDO SCHLESINGER
  4. Presidenta
  5. Ausente con comisión
  6. NATALIA ÁNGEL CABO
  7. Magistrada
  8. DIANA FAJARDO RIVERA
  9. Magistrada
  10. Ausente con comisión
  11. JORGE ENRIQUE IBÁÑEZ NAJAR
  12. Magistrado
  13. ALEJANDRO LINARES CANTILLO
  14. Magistrado
  15. Ausente con comisión
  16. ANTONIO JOSÉ LIZARAZO OCAMPO
  17. Magistrado
  18. PAOLA ANDREA MENESES MOSQUERA
  19. Magistrada
  20. HERNÁN CORREA CARDOZO
  21. Magistrado (E)
  22. JOSE FERNANDO REYES CUARTAS
  23. Magistrado
  24. MARTHA VICTORIA SÁCHICA MÉNDEZ
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela